<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Stacy Bias - Fat Activist and Body Image Campus Speaker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stacybias.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stacybias.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:37:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ew. Seriously? Geico is So Gross. (Or, Why this shit really isn&#8217;t funny.) by Stacy Bias</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/02/ew-seriously-geico-is-so-gross-or-why-this-shit-really-isnt-funny/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Bias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=554#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>I suppose I can understand that, Jessica. But, if the guy wasn&#039;t &quot;overweight&quot; at all then the ad wouldn&#039;t work. Sure, he&#039;s not FAT-FAT, but he&#039;s pudgy. He&#039;s got a bit of a double chin and a baby-fat face. Think about a wafer thin dude with cut abs and an angular jaw placed in this commercial. You&#039;d spend half the commercial wondering why he was doing a weight-loss schtick. This guy is believable as someone who would go to this particular extreme in order to lose weight. If he wasn&#039;t believable then the ad would simply fail. They could have done the same bit with the premise of wanting to shift his eating habits to organic and natural foods, or to vegetarianism. Instead, they specifically chose weight loss as the premise of the ad. That wasn&#039;t without reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I can understand that, Jessica. But, if the guy wasn&#8217;t &#8220;overweight&#8221; at all then the ad wouldn&#8217;t work. Sure, he&#8217;s not FAT-FAT, but he&#8217;s pudgy. He&#8217;s got a bit of a double chin and a baby-fat face. Think about a wafer thin dude with cut abs and an angular jaw placed in this commercial. You&#8217;d spend half the commercial wondering why he was doing a weight-loss schtick. This guy is believable as someone who would go to this particular extreme in order to lose weight. If he wasn&#8217;t believable then the ad would simply fail. They could have done the same bit with the premise of wanting to shift his eating habits to organic and natural foods, or to vegetarianism. Instead, they specifically chose weight loss as the premise of the ad. That wasn&#8217;t without reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ew. Seriously? Geico is So Gross. (Or, Why this shit really isn&#8217;t funny.) by Jessica</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/02/ew-seriously-geico-is-so-gross-or-why-this-shit-really-isnt-funny/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=554#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>I guess, for me, it boils down to I didn&#039;t make any connection that the guy was meant to be fat or &quot;overweight.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess, for me, it boils down to I didn&#8217;t make any connection that the guy was meant to be fat or &#8220;overweight.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ew. Seriously? Geico is So Gross. (Or, Why this shit really isn&#8217;t funny.) by Stacy Bias</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/02/ew-seriously-geico-is-so-gross-or-why-this-shit-really-isnt-funny/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Bias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=554#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>Hi Jessica - Thanks for your thoughts! I agree that Geico is a fairly ethical corporation, as corporations go. I do have to maintain that I disagree with your overall argument, however. While my reading of the commercial may be extreme, I find yours to be far too forgiving. The truth of both the commercial&#039;s intent and impact is more likely in the middle between us. I caution, however, that in a battle between blatant stereotype and more subtle stereotype like the above, the subtle stereotype is far more effective a means of perpetuating negative representations.  At least with blatant stereotyping, the ridiculousness of it forces the audience to have a confrontation with it. It demands to be acknowledged and that forces the audience members to make a decision either to accept or reject it.  More subtle use of stereotyping as seen in the Geico commercial passes largely unnoticed, is simply accepted without forcing recognition, and thus is an ideal tool for naturalizing myths and perpetuating stereotypes. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem06.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Semiotic analysis&lt;/a&gt; reveals the hidden undercurrent in everyday media examples. It is the little details (like the lack of blazer, the old t-shirt, the eating alone in the dark in a car) that tell a story. These directorial choices (made intentionally) add up to a narrative and, in this case, that narrative is jam-packed with fat stereotypes. If, by your reading, the man was hiding from the girls he hired, that still shows passivity. If he was tired of it and so annoyed as to &#039;escape&#039; from them, why didn&#039;t he simply tell them to stop rather than choose to hide away at night and scarf a cheeseburger so desperately that he smeared it all over his face in the process? Each of these choices have meaning. And it&#039;s in the refusal to examine and confront those meanings that we continue to let them circulate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jessica &#8211; Thanks for your thoughts! I agree that Geico is a fairly ethical corporation, as corporations go. I do have to maintain that I disagree with your overall argument, however. While my reading of the commercial may be extreme, I find yours to be far too forgiving. The truth of both the commercial&#8217;s intent and impact is more likely in the middle between us. I caution, however, that in a battle between blatant stereotype and more subtle stereotype like the above, the subtle stereotype is far more effective a means of perpetuating negative representations.  At least with blatant stereotyping, the ridiculousness of it forces the audience to have a confrontation with it. It demands to be acknowledged and that forces the audience members to make a decision either to accept or reject it.  More subtle use of stereotyping as seen in the Geico commercial passes largely unnoticed, is simply accepted without forcing recognition, and thus is an ideal tool for naturalizing myths and perpetuating stereotypes. <a href="http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem06.html" rel="nofollow">Semiotic analysis</a> reveals the hidden undercurrent in everyday media examples. It is the little details (like the lack of blazer, the old t-shirt, the eating alone in the dark in a car) that tell a story. These directorial choices (made intentionally) add up to a narrative and, in this case, that narrative is jam-packed with fat stereotypes. If, by your reading, the man was hiding from the girls he hired, that still shows passivity. If he was tired of it and so annoyed as to &#8216;escape&#8217; from them, why didn&#8217;t he simply tell them to stop rather than choose to hide away at night and scarf a cheeseburger so desperately that he smeared it all over his face in the process? Each of these choices have meaning. And it&#8217;s in the refusal to examine and confront those meanings that we continue to let them circulate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ew. Seriously? Geico is So Gross. (Or, Why this shit really isn&#8217;t funny.) by Jessica</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/02/ew-seriously-geico-is-so-gross-or-why-this-shit-really-isnt-funny/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=554#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to preface this by saying I work for GEICO and am fat.

I thought the ad was funny, but I also never even made a connection that the man was supposed to be overweight.  I thought he was intended to be an average American who wants to lose weight (read: everyone who isn&#039;t in on HAES, what have you.)  I don&#039;t think he was intended to be more slovenly than any other American male, honestly.  I do think it is a little bit of a stretch to say that if he&#039;s not wearing a blazer, he&#039;s schlubby and if he&#039;s wearing an old t shirt, they&#039;re making him out to be a slob.

I don&#039;t think the last scene is intended to be secret eating (I get hungry and have dinner in my car sometimes.  It&#039;s not to hide it from anyone) and if it is, it&#039;s to get away from the girls he hired, which I thought he was regretting at that point.

Anyway, I kind of just wanted to chime in on this because I consider myself part of the size acceptance movement-- it is very dear to me.  Also, in my time at GEICO I was actually surprised (and delighted) by how ethical the company is-- I know for a fact I do not earn less than my male or thin counterparts, and the promotional structure is based on performance.  I actually was thinking about blogging about it because I was relieved and refreshed to figure out I was working for a company that won&#039;t screw me over because I wear a size 30.  I can actually say with confidence I don&#039;t believe that GEICO was trying to touch on negative stereotypes to make the ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to preface this by saying I work for GEICO and am fat.</p>
<p>I thought the ad was funny, but I also never even made a connection that the man was supposed to be overweight.  I thought he was intended to be an average American who wants to lose weight (read: everyone who isn&#8217;t in on HAES, what have you.)  I don&#8217;t think he was intended to be more slovenly than any other American male, honestly.  I do think it is a little bit of a stretch to say that if he&#8217;s not wearing a blazer, he&#8217;s schlubby and if he&#8217;s wearing an old t shirt, they&#8217;re making him out to be a slob.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the last scene is intended to be secret eating (I get hungry and have dinner in my car sometimes.  It&#8217;s not to hide it from anyone) and if it is, it&#8217;s to get away from the girls he hired, which I thought he was regretting at that point.</p>
<p>Anyway, I kind of just wanted to chime in on this because I consider myself part of the size acceptance movement&#8211; it is very dear to me.  Also, in my time at GEICO I was actually surprised (and delighted) by how ethical the company is&#8211; I know for a fact I do not earn less than my male or thin counterparts, and the promotional structure is based on performance.  I actually was thinking about blogging about it because I was relieved and refreshed to figure out I was working for a company that won&#8217;t screw me over because I wear a size 30.  I can actually say with confidence I don&#8217;t believe that GEICO was trying to touch on negative stereotypes to make the ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ew. Seriously? Geico is So Gross. (Or, Why this shit really isn&#8217;t funny.) by Stacy Bias</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/02/ew-seriously-geico-is-so-gross-or-why-this-shit-really-isnt-funny/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Bias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=554#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>Hey, E.  Yep. It&#039;s the remembering to stop and think that&#039;s the problem. So exhausting to maintain that kind of critical perspective. I know I can&#039;t keep it up all the time! I think my little hate-radar is attuned to note that shit is messed up, but often that&#039;s as far as it goes. I don&#039;t really engage with how or why. But when I saw others laughing at this ad rather than even perfunctorily acknowledging its harmfulness, my internal media critic went into hyperdrive. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, E.  Yep. It&#8217;s the remembering to stop and think that&#8217;s the problem. So exhausting to maintain that kind of critical perspective. I know I can&#8217;t keep it up all the time! I think my little hate-radar is attuned to note that shit is messed up, but often that&#8217;s as far as it goes. I don&#8217;t really engage with how or why. But when I saw others laughing at this ad rather than even perfunctorily acknowledging its harmfulness, my internal media critic went into hyperdrive. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ew. Seriously? Geico is So Gross. (Or, Why this shit really isn&#8217;t funny.) by E</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/02/ew-seriously-geico-is-so-gross-or-why-this-shit-really-isnt-funny/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=554#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen this ad (my tv stopped working in September and I haven&#039;t replaced it, and I can&#039;t say I miss the ads!), but I do appreciate your pointing out the offensiveness that we are just so used to.  I find MANY, if not most, commercials offensive, when I really watch and think about them.  Gender and Fat stereotypes run amok (and race stereotypes as well, though being white I am less attuned to those).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen this ad (my tv stopped working in September and I haven&#8217;t replaced it, and I can&#8217;t say I miss the ads!), but I do appreciate your pointing out the offensiveness that we are just so used to.  I find MANY, if not most, commercials offensive, when I really watch and think about them.  Gender and Fat stereotypes run amok (and race stereotypes as well, though being white I am less attuned to those).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Strong4Life and the Ideology of Health by Stacy Bias</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/02/on-strong4life-and-the-ideology-of-health/#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Bias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=545#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks! It was really fun to come up with! I did a sweeter one with my mom as well, but this seemed most appropriate for this post. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks! It was really fun to come up with! I did a sweeter one with my mom as well, but this seemed most appropriate for this post. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Strong4Life and the Ideology of Health by Big Liberty</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/02/on-strong4life-and-the-ideology-of-health/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=545#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen a lot of the &quot;I Stand&quot; posters (which are great) but your is by far the greatest. Sociological argument for the win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a lot of the &#8220;I Stand&#8221; posters (which are great) but your is by far the greatest. Sociological argument for the win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to Margaret Cho Re: Karl Lagerfeld by Dr. Deah Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/02/an-open-letter-to-margaret-cho-re-karl-lagerfeld/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Deah Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=543#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Stacy!! And hope she reat letter. I hope she reads it. When my kid was in elem. school, he was teased for being gay. I was so proud of him when he told the teacher that he wasn&#039;t upset at being called gay, he was upset that the kids who were calling him gay thought that it was an insult when it is just the way some people are. If you replace the word fat with that, you have a similar story. I know people will argue and say, well, people are born gay they aren&#039;t born fat. But genetics are genetics and even so...where is the justification for the hatred?? Honestly, the only thing I hate is hate. Warmly, Dr. Deah leftoverstogo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Stacy!! And hope she reat letter. I hope she reads it. When my kid was in elem. school, he was teased for being gay. I was so proud of him when he told the teacher that he wasn&#8217;t upset at being called gay, he was upset that the kids who were calling him gay thought that it was an insult when it is just the way some people are. If you replace the word fat with that, you have a similar story. I know people will argue and say, well, people are born gay they aren&#8217;t born fat. But genetics are genetics and even so&#8230;where is the justification for the hatred?? Honestly, the only thing I hate is hate. Warmly, Dr. Deah leftoverstogo.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Compassion and Liminality by Nancy Lebovitz</title>
		<link>http://stacybias.net/2012/01/on-compassion-and-liminality/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Lebovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacybias.net/?p=536#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>Just found something interesting on the subject from Scott Sonnon:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I was training a young girl for Olympic trials in archery. Half of what she was practicing involved removing what coaching psychology calls &quot;perturbances,&quot; but we can just call... excessive movement of the body and mind. She strengthened her structure so that she didn&#039;t need excessive muscular action to hold position, just quiet efficiency. She practiced her breathing so that she could exhale and slow her heart rate, and find that space between heart beats (asystole) where body is its most potentially quiet.

But not just the least amount of disturbance, she also had to balance the ongoing movements outside with wind and gravity and pressure, as well as those within the body: its constant changing tensions, expansions and contractions. The other half of her training involved finding synchronicity with these movements, their state of flow, and joining it physically and mentally... to let go at the precise moment.

No matter the martial art style, when I fought them at their respective championships, one virtue held true about their precision: Aiming happened Always In Motion. Like Wayne Gretsky said, &quot;A good hockey player plays where the puck is. A great hockey player plays where the puck is going to be.&quot; If you want to be accurate in anything, realize balance isn&#039;t motionless. It&#039;s a balance act, never &quot;in balance.&quot; Nothing is. Everything is always in motion. It&#039;s a confusing myth which scuttles everything from holding a yoga posture with balance, to balancing our check book.

Much like meditation, you cannot still the mind. The paradox of meditation is that the more you try to stop the chattering monkey in your head, the more clamorous he becomes, often flying poo in the process. You can only allow the mind to move with no &quot;abiding place&quot; - to let it the thoughts flow without any attachment to them.

Of course you need to develop galvanize yourself against distractions, but the balancing act demands that we &quot;go with the flow&quot; to hit our target goals with optimal precision.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found something interesting on the subject from Scott Sonnon:</p>
<blockquote><p>I was training a young girl for Olympic trials in archery. Half of what she was practicing involved removing what coaching psychology calls &#8220;perturbances,&#8221; but we can just call&#8230; excessive movement of the body and mind. She strengthened her structure so that she didn&#8217;t need excessive muscular action to hold position, just quiet efficiency. She practiced her breathing so that she could exhale and slow her heart rate, and find that space between heart beats (asystole) where body is its most potentially quiet.</p>
<p>But not just the least amount of disturbance, she also had to balance the ongoing movements outside with wind and gravity and pressure, as well as those within the body: its constant changing tensions, expansions and contractions. The other half of her training involved finding synchronicity with these movements, their state of flow, and joining it physically and mentally&#8230; to let go at the precise moment.</p>
<p>No matter the martial art style, when I fought them at their respective championships, one virtue held true about their precision: Aiming happened Always In Motion. Like Wayne Gretsky said, &#8220;A good hockey player plays where the puck is. A great hockey player plays where the puck is going to be.&#8221; If you want to be accurate in anything, realize balance isn&#8217;t motionless. It&#8217;s a balance act, never &#8220;in balance.&#8221; Nothing is. Everything is always in motion. It&#8217;s a confusing myth which scuttles everything from holding a yoga posture with balance, to balancing our check book.</p>
<p>Much like meditation, you cannot still the mind. The paradox of meditation is that the more you try to stop the chattering monkey in your head, the more clamorous he becomes, often flying poo in the process. You can only allow the mind to move with no &#8220;abiding place&#8221; &#8211; to let it the thoughts flow without any attachment to them.</p>
<p>Of course you need to develop galvanize yourself against distractions, but the balancing act demands that we &#8220;go with the flow&#8221; to hit our target goals with optimal precision.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

